Health
Breaking the Silence: Why Mental Health Must Be Normalized, Not Hidden
Mental health has long been treated as a private, almost shameful struggle: something to be whispered about, if acknowledged at all. In many societies, the dominant narrative still frames it as crime, weakness, laziness, or a character flaw. Yet the reality is starkly different: irritability, aggression, vulnerability, even what we casually dismiss as “abnormality” or “laziness,” are often early symptoms of underlying mental health conditions. Left unattended, they can drive individuals into escapism, substance addiction, smoking, or other self-destructive patterns.
The time has come to treat mental health neither as a taboo nor a luxury, but as an imperative for human flourishing—just as important as physical health. My last two features in this space partially addressed some of the aspects associated with this issue, and this article forms an important continuation in that series. Recognizing mental well-being as central to human dignity requires us to confront centuries of stigma, re-examine cultural attitudes, and construct a new, evidence-based narrative of care and compassion.
History Speaks: From Ancient Wisdom to Modern Times
Human civilizations have long acknowledged mental distress. Ancient Greek physicians like Hippocrates attributed melancholia to imbalances of bodily humors, laying one of the earliest scientific foundations for understanding mood disorders. In India, classical texts such as the Charaka Samhita spoke of unmada (disorders of the mind), emphasizing that mental and physical well-being were inseparable.
Literature also mirrored these struggles. Shakespeare’s Hamlet wrestled with melancholy, while Lady Macbeth’s guilt-induced hallucinations revealed the profound interplay between psychology and human behavior. Together, these examples demonstrate that mental health challenges have always been an integral part of the human condition.
Yet history also shows regression into silence and confinement. The Enlightenment, while advancing science, stigmatized emotions as irrational excesses. By the 19th century, asylums replaced open dialogue, locking the mentally ill behind walls rather than addressing their needs. Against this backdrop, Sigmund Freud’s “talking cure” in Vienna was revolutionary—it reintroduced conversation and self-reflection as legitimate forms of healing, acknowledging that the mind, no less than the body, deserves care.
The 20th century further underscored urgency. Soldiers returning from the trenches of Europe and the Pacific in World War I and II exhibited what was then called “shell shock,” later recognized as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Writers like Erich Maria Remarque in All Quiet on the Western Front and poets such as Wilfred Owen provided haunting testimonies of invisible wounds that lingered long after battles ended. These accounts forced societies to confront trauma’s psychological toll.
And yet, despite these painful lessons, stigma endured: proof of how slow cultural attitudes are to evolve, even when evidence is overwhelming. This uneven history shows that while awareness of mental health is not new, meaningful action and genuine acceptance remain humanity’s greatest challenges.
Irritability, Aggression, and Vulnerability: Misread Signals
We often mistake early symptoms of mental distress for personality defects. When someone is constantly irritated, lashes out in aggression, or withdraws into vulnerability, the usual response is judgment rather than inquiry. “He has anger issues,” or “She’s too sensitive,” are common dismissals. Yet clinical psychology suggests these behaviors are not flaws but signals.
The American Psychological Association identifies irritability and aggression as common manifestations of anxiety disorders, depression, or unresolved trauma. Vulnerability, rather than weakness, often reflects an individual’s attempt to cope with overwhelming stress.
History provides striking examples. Winston Churchill, who called his depression his “black dog,” exhibited irritability and dark moods. These were not signs of incompetence; they coexisted with his brilliance as a wartime leader. Similarly, Virginia Woolf transformed her vulnerability into profound works of art, even as she battled her illness. Both remind us that behind the labels we attach to people lie struggles deserving compassion and treatment, not ridicule or denial.
Just as individuals must not be reduced to labels, families play a crucial role in how mental distress is addressed. A household with mature and committed members often becomes the first line of support, helping a loved one recognize that irritability, aggression, or withdrawal may signal something deeper than temperament.
Research in the Journal of Family Psychology shows that family validation and support significantly improve recovery outcomes in conditions such as depression and anxiety, while silence or ridicule worsens them. Healing is not an individual journey alone: it is a collective responsibility. By creating environments where conversations about mental health are as ordinary as discussions about physical ailments, families can prevent crises from escalating into long-term suffering.
Escapism, Laziness, and the Slippery Slope to Addiction
When untreated mental health issues become unbearable, many seek refuge in escapism. What begins as procrastination, or what society dismisses as “laziness,” is often an unconscious coping mechanism, a way of avoiding the mental weight of overwhelming tasks.
The philosopher Søren Kierkegaard described despair as a paralysis of will, a disconnection between self and purpose. This despair often manifests in inaction, not because people are lazy, but because they are battling internal conflict.
In modern times, escapism frequently morphs into substance use. Cigarettes, alcohol, or drugs offer temporary relief, numbing irritability or anxiety, but ultimately deepen despair. Lancet Psychiatry studies shows a strong correlation between untreated depression and substance abuse, with individuals turning to smoking and alcohol as maladaptive self-medication. Escapism thus becomes addiction, and addiction becomes a prison.
Fyodor Dostoevsky illustrated this cycle in Notes from Underground, where the protagonist retreats into bitterness and isolation, lashing out at society while sinking deeper into self-destruction. The parallels with today’s struggles are uncanny: when mental health remains unaddressed, it breeds behaviors we despise in others and in ourselves, yet they are rooted in unacknowledged pain.
The Philosophy of Compassion: Rethinking Judgment
If irritability, vulnerability, and escapism are signals of distress, then our tendency to hate or dismiss people for their behavior becomes ethically questionable. The Stoic philosopher Epictetus once said: “When you are offended at any man’s fault, turn to yourself and study your own failings. Then you will forget your anger.” This is not a call to excuse harmful actions, but an invitation to empathy.
Modern neuroscience reinforces this perspective. Research in affective neuroscience shows that brain circuits governing fear and anger are often hyperactive in individuals with mental disorders. Their reactions are shaped less by moral weakness and more by neurochemical imbalance. Recognizing this shifts our approach from moralizing to contextualizing, from condemnation to understanding.
It is important to note that even well-educated, self-aware individuals often find themselves helpless in the face of their own mental struggles. They may understand their condition intellectually yet feel trapped by their own minds, and in doing so, they sometimes resist those who hold up a mirror or offer advice—seeing such interventions as judgment rather than support. This underlines that awareness alone is not always sufficient.
Public figures have helped break this silence. Indian actress Deepika Padukone, after battling depression, founded The Live Love Laugh Foundation to spread awareness. U.S. gymnast Simone Biles prioritized mental health during the Tokyo Olympics, challenging the notion that excellence requires silence about struggle. These examples show that acknowledging weakness is not surrender but strength—and that breaking stigma inspires others to seek help.
Towards a Culture of Treatment and Openness
The final step in normalizing mental health is not merely conversation but also ensuring treatment is accessible and imperative. Just as we would never dismiss chest pain as laziness, we must not dismiss persistent irritability or withdrawal as personality quirks. Therapy, counseling, and medication should be seen as ordinary as physiotherapy or antibiotics.
The World Health Organization emphasizes that each penny invested in scaling up treatment for common mental disorders yields a fourfold return in improved health and productivity. Beyond economics, it is a moral obligation: untreated mental illness leads to broken families, lost potential, and preventable suffering.
Literature again offers wisdom. Albert Camus, in The Myth of Sisyphus, wrote that the greatest philosophical question is whether life is worth living. His answer—yes, even in absurdity—reminds us that humans can create meaning despite suffering. Therapy and treatment embody this very act: confronting despair and choosing life over escape.
Conclusion: The Courage to Speak, the Duty to Act
Normalizing mental health is more than reducing stigma; it is reimagining our ethical duty to ourselves and each other. From Churchill’s “black dog” to Virginia Woolf’s prose, from Kierkegaard’s despair to Camus’s rebellion, history and literature remind us that mental struggles are universal, not aberrations. Irritability, aggression, vulnerability, laziness, and even escapism are not moral failings but cries for help. Left unheeded, they can lead to addiction, self-destruction, and alienation.
We must therefore cultivate a culture where acknowledging mental health is as ordinary as discussing diet or exercise, where treatment is sought without shame, and where compassion replaces judgment. The true measure of progress is not simply economic growth or technological achievement but the collective courage to speak openly about what weighs on the human mind—and to act, rationally and compassionately, to heal it.
—
iStock image